The government is taking away your basic right to have a good time by targeting your favourite bars, pubs and clubs. Protest against these ill-conceived and draconian measures now!
Add your voice to the debate. Register or Login to submit a new blog entry.
Young drinkers, don't get dragged into pubs' fight Joel Gibson 
January 9, 2009 Hic. You'll have to excuse me. It's 2.30am, I've just queued for 20 minutes at the bar and they've told me I can't have a drink for another 10 minutes because they're having a "time-out" imposed by the State Government. I didn't even want a cocktail or a glass to drink from. Just a beer in plastic is all. I'd take my custom elsewhere but there's a 2am lockout. I'm so ropeable I've decided to spend my 10 minutes of prohibition putting my thoughts in writing on the back of this beer coaster. I might even have my photo taken and join the campaign dontpunishus.com.au to lobby the Government to restore my drinking rights. That'll fix the wowser bastards. Hic. Such is the sad lot of the responsible drinker at the state's most punchy pubs, according to a new "grassroots" campaign organised by a bar-hopping consultant called David Hempton and backed by the publicans' lobby. The way they tell it, new curbs on drinking after midnight at the state's 48 most violent bars are an infringement of the civil liberties of young patrons, who pay the price for a few aggro and self-destructive troublemakers. In an attempt to mobilise their boozed-up base, they are photographing patrons with speech bubbles saying "Don't treat me like a child" and "I'll decide when it's time to go home thanks" and posting them online. Don't do it, kids. As your representative in the media, I must advise you to step away from the camera and shut up. Under-35s already have an image problem. The way the world sees it, we drink too much, we post images of ourselves on the internet wearing and doing things we will one day regret, we are political ignoramuses and we whinge. This campaign quite brilliantly manages to push all four buttons at once. The world is trying to cope with a recession, a war in the Middle East and an all-out assault by the forces of Paris Hilton, and you want to fight for your right to party. But like a late-night skinny-dip that ends up on Facebook for all to see, this fight will backfire. The morning after, you will look a spoilt, drunk prat who does not understand what the latest battle royal between governments and publicans is all about. These new bar rules are not about mums and dads in Macquarie Street and Canberra turning off the tap on generations X and Y. They are about stopping a small group of people from generation YDFVB - young, dumb and full of VB - giving everyone under 35 a bad name. And they are about putting pressure on those venues that treat gen YDFVB like VIPs to treat them like the children they are. Most of us are being inconvenienced for the sins of a few of us but it is a small price to pay. When they banned $1 drinks (remember those?) the majority suffered for the excesses of a few, as they do after midnight when bottleshops must close. That is what happens when a product displays a tendency to make people dance badly and headbutt strangers. The jury is still out on whether the late-night restrictions imposed on the Top 48 will work. Previous trials have found violence increases at first, as confused drunks learn about the rules the hard way, but often declines in the longer term. Blind Freddy could see from the start that the regular 10-minute time-out is a farcical notion that turns bar staff into timekeepers and patrons into racers, desperate to get to the bar before the siren sounds. As for the rest, we shall see. But let the professional lobbyists duke it out; do not become an unwitting stooge because they approached you at your most malleable. At the very least, send the pub an invoice for the use of your image. Suggest they take a photograph of the angry ape behind you instead, the one punching a passer-by for looking at his girlfriend. If you are irked by the new rules, it means you are probably at a venue that could be the setting for a Tarantino film. Go elsewhere. But the vision of a turpsed 21-year-old thumping the bar at 1am, demanding a margarita, is doing nothing for the cause of young people everywhere. I am betraying my age here but when the Brooklyn hip-hop trio the Beastie Boys released the song Fight For Your Right (To Party), millions of kids failed to realise it was a joke, a send-up of dopey party songs - and still do. "There were tonnes of guys singing along to Fight For Your Right who were oblivious to the fact it was a total goof on them," Mike D from the band has said. If the most you have to fight for is your right to drink cocktails from a glass after midnight in one of the state's most dangerous gin joints and you're still whining about it, the joke is on you. Joel Gibson is a Herald journalist. This story was found at: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/01/08/1231004192755.html
Member Login
Recommend
Apparently under-35's have a bad image. That may well be right but people still need the freedom to make their own decisions. That should be encouraged not dampened. Are young people not allowed to protest something that affects them because it might hurt their reputation? Seems to me it would hurt more to stay quiet.
You say that young people don't understand what these laws are about. That they are not about stopping Gen X & Y drinking but about stopping a small group of thugs. Surely the best way to do that is to effectively arrest and prosecute those thugs. Instead trouble makers are moved into public spaces without supervision where they can cause even more damage than they're doing already.
Our Nanny state is moving to take care of us by removing all the risk in our lives. Instead of educating people to make their own decisions and take responsibility for their actions, we are just removing the dangers. These laws are doing the same.
Some people go out to cause trouble, some are encouraged to by others and all do so more easily whilst under the effects of alcohol. Are we seriously saying that instead of arresting the trouble makers and educating everyone, we'll just stop the alcohol?
We, as Australians, used to take responsibility for the consequences of our actions. Now whenever we do something stupid we're looking for someone or something else to blame.
When I was brought up, kids were allowed to make mistakes and were then taught the consequences of their actions. The government seems to have forgotten that lesson.
Thanks for your comments.. as far as I am aware the AHA look after the interests of their members.. That is not my concern.. This campaign is supposed to unite the voice of the members patrons and educate them on what Rees NSW Government is doing their social lives.
When the SMH wrote that it was paid for by the 'industry', of course it is, it is primarily funded by the individual pubs that are wanting the voice of their patrons heard. ( I do call them all week- I do not call the AHA)
The main message of the campaign is that the legislation is as infringment on civil liberties and also that the legislation is illogical, counterproductive and fails to address what is a serious issue in the community.
As mentioned elsewhere i had a Facebook group with a 2000 people in November which is now close to 15000, hence it is grassroots.
To raise awareness about the campaign I could have come and played the banjo on the front lawn of every pub in NSW but it would have taken quite a while to raise enough money and get the message across.. It is far easier to call 100 Pubs..
Thanks
David H
Post your comment